Off-topic Serenity
quotes aside; the first nine chapters of Stealing
Buddha’s Dinner were a bit of an eye-opener. I’m not one who usually reads
memoirs, so it amazes me that a complete stranger has placed a large portion of
her life and what has made her into the person she is out in words for anyone
to read. It strikes me as a quiet but incredibly brave declaration of the fact that
she knows with confidence both who she is and where she comes from. It’s as if
she took this idea of American perfection through food, kidnapped it, and made
it uniquely hers, like she does after she and her sister trash Jennifer’s room
and she steals the cookies. Nguyen writes that “no one had noticed the missing
cookies, and my sister and I had said nothing. As I pedaled toward Sienna
Street I cherished that secret. I knew the cookies would stay with me forever”
(71). What fascinates me most about this book however, is the fact that it
confuses me. It’s not often I meet a book that can do that.
Perhaps it’s
nothing more than the fact that the gap between her generation and my
generation has given me a different outlook on food and the way society uses
food to help interpret things such as social and monetary standing, or maybe it
has to do with the family environment I was raised in, I don’t know. The point
is that while I understand what the author is talking about, what she is saying
does not make sense to me. Nguyen states of her elementary school lunch room
that “a student was measured by the contents of her lunch bag, which displayed status,
class, and parental love” (75). I remember similar elements in my own
elementary school, but I never really gave it much thought until now. During
that time I was confident that what I had in my lunch—as it rarely contained
anything packaged in plastic and made at a factory—not only was better for me
nutritionally speaking, but also in taste. Don’t get me wrong, I was jealous of
the other kids because they got things in their lunches like Little Debbie
brownies or Hostess cupcakes, but it was more along the lines of admiring a
friend’s mint-condition vanilla-colored 1970 Corvette with leather interiors (ignore
me while I drool at that image) while at the same time knowing that your own four-door
sedan is safer, more reliable, and gets two and a half times as many miles to
the gallon. I think this has a lot to do with how I was raised to view food,
which came mostly through my mother.
Unlike
Nguyen, I can remember being so small that I had to use a step-stool to reach
the counter while my mother taught me how to make bread from scratch. My mother
taught me to appreciate the process that is good food, rather than just the
product itself. Nguyen has some of the same connection with her grandmother Noi,
although less so because of the differing tradition of her culture that dictates
the eldest members of the family provides food for the younger members who in
turn work for the money that buys the ingredients for more food. So while there
was less emphasis on the process, there is a very large appreciation for the
final outcome. For example I love the way Nguyen phrased it when she describes
what happened when she and her sister took the rice cakes to school for Tet. Their
teacher reprimands them, “and just like that, [the teacher] took the banh chung away from [Nguyen and her
sister]. We knew then that they would be going to the Land of Sharing, of white
people looking and declining. The cakes would grow crusty and stale under the
recoiling gazes of our classmates. They would be ruined by the staring” (102). This
is similar to something my mother is fond of saying: “I didn’t make it to look
at.” However, this brings me back to being confused, because I still don’t
understand how someone could love foods that are so bizarrely unfamiliar to
them as opposed to the dishes they know. It is an entirely foreign notion to me
that a person could want to fit in to a new place so badly that they would give
up everything about their old way of life. This could just be my
born-an-American-citizen bias showing itself, but to me familiar things—especially
home food—have always been comfort mechanisms, things that give new parts of
life something to hang onto in a world that might not always be a happy,
welcoming place.
No comments:
Post a Comment